Skip to main content

A comparison and validation of two surface ship readiness models


Published September 1994
SHOW MORE


Thesis advisor(s): So Young Sohn

"September 1994."

Thesis (M.S. in Operations Research) Naval Postgraduate School, September 1994

Includes bibliographical references

Two models are used by the U.S. Navy to predict surface ship readiness: the Surface Ship Resources to Material Readiness Model (SRM) and the Surface Ship Inventory to Material Readiness Model (SIM). This thesis examines both models, in order to validate the model fit and to determine whether the two models predict significantly different levels of readiness for a given data set using both cross validation and jackknife procedures. Examination of the models reveals that there are numerous insignificant predictor variables in the models. Normality assumptions made on the non-linear regression are not proper. Additionally, the performance of both the SRM and the SIM at the ship level is poor. However, once aggregated to the fleet level, prediction performance improves drastically. Analysis of the jackknife confidence intervals indicate that the SRM and SIM predict significantly different levels of readiness. While the SIM performs slightly better than the SRM, one has to consider the marginal cost associated with the more complex SIM for model selection. Finally, use of reduced models and model modifications such as use of Poisson regression are recommended

Mode of access: World Wide Web

System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader

US Navy (USN) author


Publisher Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School;Springfield, Va.: Available from National Technical Information Service
Pages 134
Language en_US
Call number ocn640620863
Digitizing sponsor Naval Postgraduate School, Dudley Knox Library
Book contributor Naval Postgraduate School, Dudley Knox Library
Collection navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink; americana
Notes some content may be lost due to the binding of the book.

Full catalog record MARCXML

[Open Library icon]This book has an editable web page on Open Library.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review.
PEOPLE ALSO FOUND
Source: half
Source: half